By Andrew Kariuki
Nairobi County Government, under Governor Johnson Sakaja, defied a High Court order by demolishing a section of the Gikomba shoe market overnight on March 31, 2026.
The demolition was carried out in the dead of night of 30,March,2026 while traders were away, with many waking up to flattened stalls and scattered merchandise in one of Nairobi’s busiest informal trading hubs.
The operation targeted structures said to be on riparian land along the Nairobi River and was conducted under tight security, with county officials citing the lapse of an eviction notice issued to traders.
However, the High Court had earlier directed that the status quo be maintained at Gikomba market and surrounding areas pending the hearing and determination of a case filed by traders.
In her ruling, Lady Justice Lilian Kimani ordered that “the current status quo on the suit land be maintained,” effectively barring demolitions, evictions or any interference with the affected properties.
The petition, filed through lawyer Babu Owino on behalf of traders, challenged the demolitions as unlawful and unconstitutional. The traders argued that they are lawful allottees and bona fide proprietors with constitutionally protected property rights.
They further contend that the demolitions violate their rights to human dignity, property, housing and fair administrative action as guaranteed under Articles 28, 40, 43, and 47 of the Constitution.
According to court documents, the petitioners also argue that authorities failed to comply with legal safeguards governing evictions, including requirements for adequate notice, meaningful consultation, humane treatment and provision of alternative settlement.
The demolitions come amid intensified enforcement efforts by authorities to reclaim riparian land following recent floods that caused widespread destruction and loss of life across the country.
The floods claimed more than 100 lives nationwide, with Nairobi recording at least 37 fatalities, prompting renewed government action against structures along riverbanks.
Despite this, traders at Gikomba have decried the demolition, describing it as a major economic setback. Many said they lost goods and investments, with some stating they had hoped for more time or alternative arrangements.
The petition also raises concerns over selective enforcement, with traders arguing that informal and economically vulnerable communities are being disproportionately targeted compared to other developments along the river.
The matter is still pending before the High Court for further directions.
