In a surprising turn of events, the Labour Committee has rejected President Ruto’s nominee, Dr. Phyllis Wagacha, as the member representing the Public Service Commission (PSC) at the Salaries and Remuneration Commission (SRC).
The committee cited her age as the main reason for their decision, asserting that she has surpassed the mandatory retirement age.
Dr. Wagacha, a highly respected professional in her field, is 75.
While her experience and expertise were not called into question, the committee emphasized the importance of adhering to the retirement regulations set forth by the government.
According to these regulations, individuals are required to retire at the age of 70.
Members of Parliament involved in the decision defended their stance, stating that it was necessary to uphold the principles of fairness and adherence to the law.
They argued that allowing an exception, in this case, could set a dangerous precedent and potentially undermine the retirement regulations that have been put in place to ensure a smooth transition of power and maintain the integrity of public institutions.
This decision has sparked a lively debate among political pundits and citizens alike.
Supporters of Dr. Wagacha argue that her age should not disqualify her from serving in a capacity for which she is well-suited.
They contend that her knowledge and experience would have been valuable assets to the SRC.
On the other hand, critics argue that rules and regulations must be followed to ensure transparency and accountability.
As the controversy unfolds, it remains to be seen who will be nominated as the new representative of the PSC at the SRC, and what impact this decision will have on the future of the commission.
